<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Re-classification Debate: Should Fly Waste Be Taxed Under Heading 5505.20 or 5601.20? Evidence Required for Change.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=33809</link>
    <description>Re-classification of goods - fly waste - classified under heading 5505.20 or under heading 5601.20? - the appellant had been initially directed to classify the goods under 5601 and any re-classification thereafter would have to be based on proper evidence - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2017 11:20:42 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2017 11:20:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=461478" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Re-classification Debate: Should Fly Waste Be Taxed Under Heading 5505.20 or 5601.20? Evidence Required for Change.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=33809</link>
      <description>Re-classification of goods - fly waste - classified under heading 5505.20 or under heading 5601.20? - the appellant had been initially directed to classify the goods under 5601 and any re-classification thereafter would have to be based on proper evidence - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2017 11:20:42 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=33809</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>