<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 715 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340212</link>
    <description>The Tribunal modified the order, setting aside the demand for the appellant&#039;s liability for the payment of the differential duty, interest, and penalties under the Central Excise Act, 1944. The judgment clarified the inclusion of charges in the assessable value and the interpretation of Valuation Rules for different periods, providing a detailed legal analysis for each issue addressed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2017 23:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=461468" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 715 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340212</link>
      <description>The Tribunal modified the order, setting aside the demand for the appellant&#039;s liability for the payment of the differential duty, interest, and penalties under the Central Excise Act, 1944. The judgment clarified the inclusion of charges in the assessable value and the interpretation of Valuation Rules for different periods, providing a detailed legal analysis for each issue addressed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340212</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>