https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340205 The Tribunal set aside the impugned orders and allowed the appeals, emphasizing the importance of maintaining consistent dates in legal proceedings for review orders based on the receipt of adjudication orders. The Tribunal found discrepancies in the dates provided by the Revenue, concluding that if the original dates of communication were correct, all review orders exceeded the time limit. This decision underscores the significance of adhering to procedural timelines and presenting factual information consistently to uphold the integrity and validity of legal decisions. en-us Fri, 07 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Feb 2018 14:18:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340205 The Tribunal set aside the impugned orders and allowed the appeals, emphasizing the importance of maintaining consistent dates in legal proceedings for review orders based on the receipt of adjudication orders. The Tribunal found discrepancies in the dates provided by the Revenue, concluding that if the original dates of communication were correct, all review orders exceeded the time limit. This decision underscores the significance of adhering to procedural timelines and presenting factual information consistently to uphold the integrity and validity of legal decisions. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 07 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340205