<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 705 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340202</link>
    <description>The court quashed the letters directing the freezing of the petitioner&#039;s bank accounts, citing the lack of legal basis and absence of a show cause notice. The petitioner was allowed to operate the accounts upon providing security of Rs. 10 crore. The court emphasized the importance of due process and ruled in favor of the petitioner&#039;s business operations, while preserving the DRI&#039;s investigative rights regarding the alleged diversion of duty-free imported gold.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Dec 2017 12:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=461457" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 705 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340202</link>
      <description>The court quashed the letters directing the freezing of the petitioner&#039;s bank accounts, citing the lack of legal basis and absence of a show cause notice. The petitioner was allowed to operate the accounts upon providing security of Rs. 10 crore. The court emphasized the importance of due process and ruled in favor of the petitioner&#039;s business operations, while preserving the DRI&#039;s investigative rights regarding the alleged diversion of duty-free imported gold.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340202</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>