<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 704 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340201</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petition, directing customs authorities to release the gold seized from the petitioner. The judgment emphasized adherence to legal procedures, particularly timely issuance and proper service of notices in customs cases. The decision stressed the necessity of concrete evidence to support claims of compliance with statutory requirements, ensuring justice and fairness.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Aug 2017 13:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=461456" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 704 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340201</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petition, directing customs authorities to release the gold seized from the petitioner. The judgment emphasized adherence to legal procedures, particularly timely issuance and proper service of notices in customs cases. The decision stressed the necessity of concrete evidence to support claims of compliance with statutory requirements, ensuring justice and fairness.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340201</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>