<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1967 (9) TMI 24 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7086</link>
    <description>Maintainability under section 54 of the Madras Agricultural Income-tax Act depended on whether the Commissioner&#039;s order was prejudicial to the assessee; an order merely declining interference with the Agricultural Income-tax Officer&#039;s orders, without directing assessment in any particular status, was held not appealable and the tax cases were dismissed. On the partition issue, the Court held that a partition deed must be judged objectively on the evidence, with no presumption against genuineness; the reasons used to disbelieve the deed were legally unsustainable, the finding was vitiated by misdirection, and certiorari correction was available. The partition was treated as genuine and the writ petitions were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 11:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=46145" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1967 (9) TMI 24 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7086</link>
      <description>Maintainability under section 54 of the Madras Agricultural Income-tax Act depended on whether the Commissioner&#039;s order was prejudicial to the assessee; an order merely declining interference with the Agricultural Income-tax Officer&#039;s orders, without directing assessment in any particular status, was held not appealable and the tax cases were dismissed. On the partition issue, the Court held that a partition deed must be judged objectively on the evidence, with no presumption against genuineness; the reasons used to disbelieve the deed were legally unsustainable, the finding was vitiated by misdirection, and certiorari correction was available. The partition was treated as genuine and the writ petitions were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7086</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>