<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 698 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340195</link>
    <description>Exemption from filing the official translation was allowed, the delay in filing the Special Leave Petition was condoned, and the Supreme Court found no legal or valid ground for interference, so the SLP was dismissed. The order records only these procedural dispositions and does not set out any substantive legal principle on the merits of the VAT or sales tax dispute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2017 11:18:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=461448" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 698 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340195</link>
      <description>Exemption from filing the official translation was allowed, the delay in filing the Special Leave Petition was condoned, and the Supreme Court found no legal or valid ground for interference, so the SLP was dismissed. The order records only these procedural dispositions and does not set out any substantive legal principle on the merits of the VAT or sales tax dispute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340195</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>