https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340191 With the enforcement of the SICA Repeal Act, 2003 and dissolution of the BIFR and AAIFR from 01.12.2016, pending proceedings under SICA stood abated, making further examination of the challenged appellate order of no practical effect. The text also states that a challenge to measures taken under Section 13(4) of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 should be pursued through the statutory remedies under Sections 17 and 18, rather than by invoking Article 226 writ jurisdiction. On that basis, the writ petition was treated as infructuous and not fit for interference. en-us Fri, 10 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 03 Jan 2018 12:47:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340191 With the enforcement of the SICA Repeal Act, 2003 and dissolution of the BIFR and AAIFR from 01.12.2016, pending proceedings under SICA stood abated, making further examination of the challenged appellate order of no practical effect. The text also states that a challenge to measures taken under Section 13(4) of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 should be pursued through the statutory remedies under Sections 17 and 18, rather than by invoking Article 226 writ jurisdiction. On that basis, the writ petition was treated as infructuous and not fit for interference. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Fri, 10 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340191