<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 693 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340190</link>
    <description>A sanctioned demerger scheme and the subsequent share purchase agreement shifted the relevant business liabilities and pending proceedings to the transferee, so execution could not continue against ITDC merely because the decree had earlier been pursued in its name. The disclosed arbitration dispute and other outstanding liabilities formed part of the transaction record, and the purchaser could not avoid that position by alleging surreptitious insertion of terms while retaining the contract. The order discharging ITDC from liability under the decree was therefore upheld, and the challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2017 12:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=461443" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 693 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340190</link>
      <description>A sanctioned demerger scheme and the subsequent share purchase agreement shifted the relevant business liabilities and pending proceedings to the transferee, so execution could not continue against ITDC merely because the decree had earlier been pursued in its name. The disclosed arbitration dispute and other outstanding liabilities formed part of the transaction record, and the purchaser could not avoid that position by alleging surreptitious insertion of terms while retaining the contract. The order discharging ITDC from liability under the decree was therefore upheld, and the challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340190</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>