<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 691 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340188</link>
    <description>Once a lessee in settled possession resists surrender after notice under the SARFAESI Act, the secured creditor cannot lawfully evict by private force or police assistance and must proceed under Section 14 before taking possession. The text further notes that where the record shows no voluntary surrender and the circumstances indicate forcible dispossession, restoration of possession to the lessee is warranted. It also states that ancillary directions inconsistent with settled procedure may be set aside, while an application for perjury action under Section 340 CrPC will fail absent a prima facie case of deliberate fabrication or misleading conduct.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2017 21:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=461441" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 691 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340188</link>
      <description>Once a lessee in settled possession resists surrender after notice under the SARFAESI Act, the secured creditor cannot lawfully evict by private force or police assistance and must proceed under Section 14 before taking possession. The text further notes that where the record shows no voluntary surrender and the circumstances indicate forcible dispossession, restoration of possession to the lessee is warranted. It also states that ancillary directions inconsistent with settled procedure may be set aside, while an application for perjury action under Section 340 CrPC will fail absent a prima facie case of deliberate fabrication or misleading conduct.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340188</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>