<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1967 (3) TMI 42 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7082</link>
    <description>Section 9(1) was applied on a substance-over-form basis to treat income from assets as taxable where the assets, though transferred or acquired in family members&#039; names, remained in substance the assessee&#039;s property. Lands settled by the assessee on his wife and children were covered because he had owned them and transferred them to them. Lands purchased directly in the names of the wife and minor children were also covered because the entire consideration came from the assessee, making the land effectively his asset for tax purposes. On that reasoning, the agricultural income from both categories of land was included in the assessee&#039;s total income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 11:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=46141" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1967 (3) TMI 42 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7082</link>
      <description>Section 9(1) was applied on a substance-over-form basis to treat income from assets as taxable where the assets, though transferred or acquired in family members&#039; names, remained in substance the assessee&#039;s property. Lands settled by the assessee on his wife and children were covered because he had owned them and transferred them to them. Lands purchased directly in the names of the wife and minor children were also covered because the entire consideration came from the assessee, making the land effectively his asset for tax purposes. On that reasoning, the agricultural income from both categories of land was included in the assessee&#039;s total income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7082</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>