<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Drawback claim</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=111639</link>
    <description>Duty drawback is intended to compensate customs duties on imported inputs used in exports and is generally not admissible where CENVAT credit has been taken on those inputs; rebate of excise on exported goods is a separate remedy. Board clarifications and AIR methodology have led to debate that input origin may be immaterial for AIR calculation and that drawback has been claimed in practice on exempted or directly imported goods, though admissibility and valuation can vary.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2017 00:20:58 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:55:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=461408" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Drawback claim</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=111639</link>
      <description>Duty drawback is intended to compensate customs duties on imported inputs used in exports and is generally not admissible where CENVAT credit has been taken on those inputs; rebate of excise on exported goods is a separate remedy. Board clarifications and AIR methodology have led to debate that input origin may be immaterial for AIR calculation and that drawback has been claimed in practice on exempted or directly imported goods, though admissibility and valuation can vary.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2017 00:20:58 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=111639</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>