<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 1166 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191010</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, sustaining the addition for machinery under Section 56(2)(vii) due to inadequate consideration. The Tribunal directed the AO to tax only the profit from alleged inflated sales, remitting the matter to determine profit based on industry norms. The Tribunal also revised the interest under Section 234C based on the revised liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2017 22:48:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=461406" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 1166 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191010</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, sustaining the addition for machinery under Section 56(2)(vii) due to inadequate consideration. The Tribunal directed the AO to tax only the profit from alleged inflated sales, remitting the matter to determine profit based on industry norms. The Tribunal also revised the interest under Section 234C based on the revised liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191010</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>