<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1967 (7) TMI 27 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7081</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the constitutionality of the wealth tax assessment on a Hindu undivided family, ruling against the assessee. Regarding the valuation of closing stock of shares, the court sided with the Wealth-tax Officer&#039;s market value assessment over the assessee&#039;s cost valuation, emphasizing the officer&#039;s discretion in choosing the valuation method. The court awarded costs to the Commissioner of Wealth-tax, directing the assessee to pay Rs. 400.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 11:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=46140" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1967 (7) TMI 27 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7081</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the constitutionality of the wealth tax assessment on a Hindu undivided family, ruling against the assessee. Regarding the valuation of closing stock of shares, the court sided with the Wealth-tax Officer&#039;s market value assessment over the assessee&#039;s cost valuation, emphasizing the officer&#039;s discretion in choosing the valuation method. The court awarded costs to the Commissioner of Wealth-tax, directing the assessee to pay Rs. 400.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7081</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>