<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 668 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340165</link>
    <description>Battery plates and battery material were treated as components of a battery for tax classification, so they attracted the same rate of tax as batteries. The appellate authorities&#039; view was upheld because the issue was already covered by an earlier Rajasthan High Court decision holding that battery parts form part of the battery for taxation, and the Revenue could not distinguish that precedent. The classification therefore remained in favour of the assessee and against a separate or higher tax treatment for the component items.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2017 16:58:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=461379" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 668 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340165</link>
      <description>Battery plates and battery material were treated as components of a battery for tax classification, so they attracted the same rate of tax as batteries. The appellate authorities&#039; view was upheld because the issue was already covered by an earlier Rajasthan High Court decision holding that battery parts form part of the battery for taxation, and the Revenue could not distinguish that precedent. The classification therefore remained in favour of the assessee and against a separate or higher tax treatment for the component items.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340165</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>