<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (5) TMI 662 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190997</link>
    <description>Interim relief that is coextensive with the final prayers in the main petition should not be granted because it would effectively pre-judge and dispose of the substantive dispute before adjudication on merits. On that basis, the request for stay of the notification and directions to grant rebate claims was rejected. The request for an out-of-turn early final hearing was also refused, as earlier pending matters on the roster and the petition&#039;s restoration after prior non-compliance provided no basis for priority over other cases. The civil application therefore failed in full, with neither interim nor scheduling relief granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2017 16:17:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=461374" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (5) TMI 662 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190997</link>
      <description>Interim relief that is coextensive with the final prayers in the main petition should not be granted because it would effectively pre-judge and dispose of the substantive dispute before adjudication on merits. On that basis, the request for stay of the notification and directions to grant rebate claims was rejected. The request for an out-of-turn early final hearing was also refused, as earlier pending matters on the roster and the petition&#039;s restoration after prior non-compliance provided no basis for priority over other cases. The civil application therefore failed in full, with neither interim nor scheduling relief granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190997</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>