https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190996 The expression "interlocutory order" under Section 397(2) CrPC was given a restricted meaning, covering only purely interim orders that do not affect substantial rights. An order summoning accused persons after acceptance of the police report and dismissal of the complaint was held not to be interlocutory because it materially affected their rights and compelled them to face trial; it was therefore revisable. Section 482 CrPC cannot be used to bypass an express statutory bar under Section 397(2), but that limitation did not apply here because the impugned summoning order was not interlocutory. The revision was accordingly competent and the matter was remitted for consideration on merits. en-us Fri, 29 Jul 1977 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 Mar 2017 14:15:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190996 The expression "interlocutory order" under Section 397(2) CrPC was given a restricted meaning, covering only purely interim orders that do not affect substantial rights. An order summoning accused persons after acceptance of the police report and dismissal of the complaint was held not to be interlocutory because it materially affected their rights and compelled them to face trial; it was therefore revisable. Section 482 CrPC cannot be used to bypass an express statutory bar under Section 397(2), but that limitation did not apply here because the impugned summoning order was not interlocutory. The revision was accordingly competent and the matter was remitted for consideration on merits. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 29 Jul 1977 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190996