https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190992 Railway safety and passenger amenities were discussed as matters implicating Articles 19 and 21 and the State's constitutional duty to protect mobility, livelihood, and life. The Court recognised the national importance of Railways and the need for safer, more efficient public transport, but noted that resource allocation, technical expertise, and phased implementation are primarily executive functions. It therefore declined to issue detailed operational mandamus or specific directions, while expressing hope for early improvements. The petitioner's contribution was acknowledged and costs were awarded, but no mandatory implementation order was made against the Union or Railway administration. en-us Fri, 28 Oct 1983 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 Mar 2017 10:14:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190992 Railway safety and passenger amenities were discussed as matters implicating Articles 19 and 21 and the State's constitutional duty to protect mobility, livelihood, and life. The Court recognised the national importance of Railways and the need for safer, more efficient public transport, but noted that resource allocation, technical expertise, and phased implementation are primarily executive functions. It therefore declined to issue detailed operational mandamus or specific directions, while expressing hope for early improvements. The petitioner's contribution was acknowledged and costs were awarded, but no mandatory implementation order was made against the Union or Railway administration. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 28 Oct 1983 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190992