<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 1285 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190990</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the reopening of assessment under Section 148 was invalid due to the Assessing Officer&#039;s lack of application of mind, quashing the same. Furthermore, the addition of alleged unexplained deposits was deemed unjustified solely based on bank deposits. The appeal was allowed, with the Tribunal emphasizing the necessity for valid reasons and evidence before reopening assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2017 10:10:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=461341" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 1285 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190990</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the reopening of assessment under Section 148 was invalid due to the Assessing Officer&#039;s lack of application of mind, quashing the same. Furthermore, the addition of alleged unexplained deposits was deemed unjustified solely based on bank deposits. The appeal was allowed, with the Tribunal emphasizing the necessity for valid reasons and evidence before reopening assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190990</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>