<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 658 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340155</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the penalty imposed under Section 78 for non-payment of service tax on a reverse charge basis. The decision emphasized the necessity of evidence and justification for penalties in tax matters, stating that mere detection by officers does not establish grounds for fraud or suppression. The Tribunal found no justification for imposing an equal penalty since the appellant had already paid the full service tax liability and interest before the show cause notice was issued.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2017 08:29:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=461332" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 658 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340155</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the penalty imposed under Section 78 for non-payment of service tax on a reverse charge basis. The decision emphasized the necessity of evidence and justification for penalties in tax matters, stating that mere detection by officers does not establish grounds for fraud or suppression. The Tribunal found no justification for imposing an equal penalty since the appellant had already paid the full service tax liability and interest before the show cause notice was issued.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340155</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>