<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1967 (1) TMI 33 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7074</link>
    <description>Section 4 of the Indian Companies Act, 1913 barred an unregistered partnership or association of more than twenty persons from carrying on business, while the statutory exception for joint families required exclusion of minor members only in specified circumstances. A karta could enter into partnership in a representative capacity, and the family members did not automatically become partners in law; however, where joint families were in substance associated through their kartas, the adult members of those families could be counted for the statutory limit. On the findings recorded, the partnership exceeded twenty persons, so registration was rightly refused.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 11:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=46133" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1967 (1) TMI 33 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7074</link>
      <description>Section 4 of the Indian Companies Act, 1913 barred an unregistered partnership or association of more than twenty persons from carrying on business, while the statutory exception for joint families required exclusion of minor members only in specified circumstances. A karta could enter into partnership in a representative capacity, and the family members did not automatically become partners in law; however, where joint families were in substance associated through their kartas, the adult members of those families could be counted for the statutory limit. On the findings recorded, the partnership exceeded twenty persons, so registration was rightly refused.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7074</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>