<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 652 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340149</link>
    <description>The tribunal set aside the demand beyond the normal period as time-barred, modified the order to exclude demand, interest, and penalty beyond the normal period, upheld the demand for rectified spirit for the normal period, and remanded the matter for verifying the sale of electricity outside and reversing the proportionate credit accordingly. The appeal was partly allowed and partly remanded for further action.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2017 08:22:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=461317" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 652 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340149</link>
      <description>The tribunal set aside the demand beyond the normal period as time-barred, modified the order to exclude demand, interest, and penalty beyond the normal period, upheld the demand for rectified spirit for the normal period, and remanded the matter for verifying the sale of electricity outside and reversing the proportionate credit accordingly. The appeal was partly allowed and partly remanded for further action.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340149</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>