https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340139 The appeals were disposed of with the modification of the impugned orders. The recovery of inadmissible CENVAT credit for staff quarter and guest house services was not upheld due to the judgment of the High Court regarding the extended period of limitation. However, the demand was enforceable for the normal period of limitation, which the advocate agreed to reverse with interest. CENVAT credit on Banquet, Pandal & Shamiana Services for the Artificial Function Hall was deemed admissible based on precedents set by the Tribunal and the High Court. en-us Tue, 07 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 Mar 2017 08:22:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340139 The appeals were disposed of with the modification of the impugned orders. The recovery of inadmissible CENVAT credit for staff quarter and guest house services was not upheld due to the judgment of the High Court regarding the extended period of limitation. However, the demand was enforceable for the normal period of limitation, which the advocate agreed to reverse with interest. CENVAT credit on Banquet, Pandal & Shamiana Services for the Artificial Function Hall was deemed admissible based on precedents set by the Tribunal and the High Court. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 07 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340139