https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340129 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a customs duty case concerning imported Gold Bars. The appellant successfully argued that the amending Notification altering the Customs duty rate could not be enforced from the same day as it was published in the Official Gazette only after the date of import clearance. As the Notification was not made available to the public on the date of import clearance, the differential duty demand on the appellant was deemed legally unsustainable. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed. en-us Thu, 09 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Nov 2017 17:09:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340129 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a customs duty case concerning imported Gold Bars. The appellant successfully argued that the amending Notification altering the Customs duty rate could not be enforced from the same day as it was published in the Official Gazette only after the date of import clearance. As the Notification was not made available to the public on the date of import clearance, the differential duty demand on the appellant was deemed legally unsustainable. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 09 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340129