<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1967 (12) TMI 64 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190984</link>
    <description>The distinction between a lease and a licence turns on the parties&#039; intention as gathered from the entire compromise and surrounding circumstances. Exclusive possession is relevant but not conclusive; the real character of the arrangement depends on substance, not labels. A compromise decree allowing continued occupation until a fixed date, with default leading to execution of the decree, may indicate permissive occupation rather than a landlord-tenant relationship. The use of the word &quot;rent&quot; and a temporary right to remain in the premises do not by themselves create a tenancy where the terms negate such an intention. On that analysis, the occupant would not fall within the statutory definition of &quot;tenant&quot; under the Orissa House-Rent Control Act, 1958.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2017 17:51:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=461265" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1967 (12) TMI 64 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190984</link>
      <description>The distinction between a lease and a licence turns on the parties&#039; intention as gathered from the entire compromise and surrounding circumstances. Exclusive possession is relevant but not conclusive; the real character of the arrangement depends on substance, not labels. A compromise decree allowing continued occupation until a fixed date, with default leading to execution of the decree, may indicate permissive occupation rather than a landlord-tenant relationship. The use of the word &quot;rent&quot; and a temporary right to remain in the premises do not by themselves create a tenancy where the terms negate such an intention. On that analysis, the occupant would not fall within the statutory definition of &quot;tenant&quot; under the Orissa House-Rent Control Act, 1958.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190984</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>