<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 621 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340118</link>
    <description>Reversal of the entire Cenvat credit with interest was treated as curing the initial availment for purposes of the abatement condition under Notification No. 01/2006-ST for Mandap Keeper service. The earlier taking of credit did not continue to disqualify the assessee once the disputed credit had been fully reversed, because the notification condition was considered satisfied at that stage. The abated rate of tax was therefore available, and denial of the exemption was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2017 14:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=461229" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 621 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340118</link>
      <description>Reversal of the entire Cenvat credit with interest was treated as curing the initial availment for purposes of the abatement condition under Notification No. 01/2006-ST for Mandap Keeper service. The earlier taking of credit did not continue to disqualify the assessee once the disputed credit had been fully reversed, because the notification condition was considered satisfied at that stage. The abated rate of tax was therefore available, and denial of the exemption was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340118</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>