<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 614 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340111</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT HYDERABAD ruled in favor of the appellant, a sub-contractor, in a service tax dispute. The Tribunal found that the main contractor had already paid the service tax for the services rendered, and demanding payment from the sub-contractor would amount to double taxation. Citing precedent, the Tribunal set aside the demand on the sub-contractor, emphasizing the importance of verifying the main contractor&#039;s tax payments to avoid unjust taxation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2017 12:16:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=461222" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 614 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340111</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT HYDERABAD ruled in favor of the appellant, a sub-contractor, in a service tax dispute. The Tribunal found that the main contractor had already paid the service tax for the services rendered, and demanding payment from the sub-contractor would amount to double taxation. Citing precedent, the Tribunal set aside the demand on the sub-contractor, emphasizing the importance of verifying the main contractor&#039;s tax payments to avoid unjust taxation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340111</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>