https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340109 The appellant successfully appealed against the disallowance of CENVAT Credit on input services due to improper documents. The judge ruled in favor of the appellant, emphasizing that the omission of registration numbers on documents did not indicate an intention to evade tax. The appellant provided detailed responses and cited relevant legal provisions and precedents. The judge overturned the disallowance, stating there was no evidence of fraud or tax evasion. The appellant was deemed eligible for the credit, and the appeal was allowed with consequential reliefs, citing previous judgments to support the decision. en-us Fri, 03 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 15 Mar 2017 12:16:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340109 The appellant successfully appealed against the disallowance of CENVAT Credit on input services due to improper documents. The judge ruled in favor of the appellant, emphasizing that the omission of registration numbers on documents did not indicate an intention to evade tax. The appellant provided detailed responses and cited relevant legal provisions and precedents. The judge overturned the disallowance, stating there was no evidence of fraud or tax evasion. The appellant was deemed eligible for the credit, and the appeal was allowed with consequential reliefs, citing previous judgments to support the decision. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 03 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340109