<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 573 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340070</link>
    <description>An appeal may be dismissed in limine where the appellant, despite service of notice, does not appear or seek adjournment and fails to prosecute the matter diligently. Applying settled precedent that a litigant must not only file an appeal but also actively pursue it, the Tribunal held that there was no basis to keep the appeal pending and dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeal for want of prosecution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2017 12:13:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=461162" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 573 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340070</link>
      <description>An appeal may be dismissed in limine where the appellant, despite service of notice, does not appear or seek adjournment and fails to prosecute the matter diligently. Applying settled precedent that a litigant must not only file an appeal but also actively pursue it, the Tribunal held that there was no basis to keep the appeal pending and dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeal for want of prosecution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340070</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>