<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (7) TMI 667 - COMPANY LAW BOARD NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190974</link>
    <description>Petitioner has member standing; change of name and indirect takeover did not trigger Articles&#039; pre-emptive transfer restriction and register must be rectified. The power of attorney and verification affidavit were valid to institute proceedings. A 2001 rights allotment was found oppressive for deliberate denial of subscription opportunity and lack of commercial justification; the allotment is set aside with options to restore pre-2001 shareholding or to exit on fair valuation by an independent valuer. Other allegations (nominee appointment, remuneration, related-party dealings, siphoning) lacked sufficient proof and do not amount to mismanagement; notices must be sent by registered post 30 days in advance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2017 10:28:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=461144" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (7) TMI 667 - COMPANY LAW BOARD NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190974</link>
      <description>Petitioner has member standing; change of name and indirect takeover did not trigger Articles&#039; pre-emptive transfer restriction and register must be rectified. The power of attorney and verification affidavit were valid to institute proceedings. A 2001 rights allotment was found oppressive for deliberate denial of subscription opportunity and lack of commercial justification; the allotment is set aside with options to restore pre-2001 shareholding or to exit on fair valuation by an independent valuer. Other allegations (nominee appointment, remuneration, related-party dealings, siphoning) lacked sufficient proof and do not amount to mismanagement; notices must be sent by registered post 30 days in advance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190974</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>