<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 566 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340063</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that interest under Section 11BB of the Central Excise Act was applicable for delayed refund disbursement, emphasizing the statutory time limit under Section 11B from the date of filing the refund claim. The Tribunal rejected the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; interpretation that considered subsequent communications for calculating the time limit and clarified that interest becomes payable after three months from the refund application date, not the order date. The impugned orders were set aside, allowing the appeals with consequential relief in line with the Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. precedent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2017 16:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=461126" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 566 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340063</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that interest under Section 11BB of the Central Excise Act was applicable for delayed refund disbursement, emphasizing the statutory time limit under Section 11B from the date of filing the refund claim. The Tribunal rejected the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; interpretation that considered subsequent communications for calculating the time limit and clarified that interest becomes payable after three months from the refund application date, not the order date. The impugned orders were set aside, allowing the appeals with consequential relief in line with the Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. precedent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340063</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>