https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340057 The Tribunal remanded the case back to the Commissioner (Appeals) due to the appellant not being given reasonable time to comply with the mandatory pre-deposit during the transitional period of the amendment. The Tribunal directed the Commissioner (Appeals) to consider the appeal on its merits without insisting on further pre-deposit since the appellant had already paid 75%. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed by way of remand to ensure that the appeal was not time-barred due to the pre-deposit issue. en-us Thu, 09 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Mar 2017 17:13:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340057 The Tribunal remanded the case back to the Commissioner (Appeals) due to the appellant not being given reasonable time to comply with the mandatory pre-deposit during the transitional period of the amendment. The Tribunal directed the Commissioner (Appeals) to consider the appeal on its merits without insisting on further pre-deposit since the appellant had already paid 75%. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed by way of remand to ensure that the appeal was not time-barred due to the pre-deposit issue. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 09 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340057