<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 559 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340056</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the tax liability of the appellants under &quot;Business Auxiliary Service&quot; for services provided to ICICI Bank, rejecting their argument for classification under &quot;Business Support Service.&quot; Additionally, the Tribunal confirmed the imposition of service tax liability for the period 1.7.2003 to 31.03.2005, dismissing the appellants&#039; claims of bias by lower authorities. The penalties imposed under various sections of the Finance Act, 1994 were upheld as the appellants failed to substantiate their contention of a bona fide belief regarding tax liability, leading to the dismissal of their appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Sep 2017 14:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=461111" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 559 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340056</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the tax liability of the appellants under &quot;Business Auxiliary Service&quot; for services provided to ICICI Bank, rejecting their argument for classification under &quot;Business Support Service.&quot; Additionally, the Tribunal confirmed the imposition of service tax liability for the period 1.7.2003 to 31.03.2005, dismissing the appellants&#039; claims of bias by lower authorities. The penalties imposed under various sections of the Finance Act, 1994 were upheld as the appellants failed to substantiate their contention of a bona fide belief regarding tax liability, leading to the dismissal of their appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340056</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>