<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 548 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340045</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the refund claims for duty deposited during specific periods were time-barred under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Appellant&#039;s claims filed in 2008, after a favorable decision in 2004, were deemed untimely as the limitation period starts after the conclusion of proceedings in favor of the Assessee. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed for being devoid of merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2017 14:15:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=461083" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 548 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340045</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the refund claims for duty deposited during specific periods were time-barred under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Appellant&#039;s claims filed in 2008, after a favorable decision in 2004, were deemed untimely as the limitation period starts after the conclusion of proceedings in favor of the Assessee. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed for being devoid of merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340045</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>