<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 547 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340044</link>
    <description>Excess Guar Gum Powder found in the factory was not fully explained, as only part was accounted for as returned defective material; confiscation was therefore sustained in principle, but the redemption fine was moderated. For the shortage of finished goods, no evidence of clandestine removal or clearance without duty payment was produced, so a penalty equal to the duty demand was found excessive and reduced. The order was modified accordingly, with the appeal allowed in part.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2017 14:15:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=461082" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 547 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340044</link>
      <description>Excess Guar Gum Powder found in the factory was not fully explained, as only part was accounted for as returned defective material; confiscation was therefore sustained in principle, but the redemption fine was moderated. For the shortage of finished goods, no evidence of clandestine removal or clearance without duty payment was produced, so a penalty equal to the duty demand was found excessive and reduced. The order was modified accordingly, with the appeal allowed in part.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340044</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>