<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 545 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340042</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Central Excise duty demand, confiscation of seized cash, and penalties imposed on specific individuals due to lack of evidence supporting clandestine activities and discrepancies in stock recording methods. The decision emphasized the necessity of concrete proof before imposing duty demands, confiscations, or penalties in excise matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2017 14:14:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=461078" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 545 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340042</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Central Excise duty demand, confiscation of seized cash, and penalties imposed on specific individuals due to lack of evidence supporting clandestine activities and discrepancies in stock recording methods. The decision emphasized the necessity of concrete proof before imposing duty demands, confiscations, or penalties in excise matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340042</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>