<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 1719 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190963</link>
    <description>Section 529-A of the Companies Act, 1956, being a Central provision with a non obstante clause, gives statutory priority to workmen&#039;s dues in winding up. Although Section 38-C of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 creates a first charge for sales tax dues, that charge operates subject to any Central Act creating a first charge. The Central priority for workmen therefore prevails over the State sales tax claim, and the workers&#039; dues rank ahead of the State&#039;s dues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2017 10:41:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=461065" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 1719 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190963</link>
      <description>Section 529-A of the Companies Act, 1956, being a Central provision with a non obstante clause, gives statutory priority to workmen&#039;s dues in winding up. Although Section 38-C of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 creates a first charge for sales tax dues, that charge operates subject to any Central Act creating a first charge. The Central priority for workmen therefore prevails over the State sales tax claim, and the workers&#039; dues rank ahead of the State&#039;s dues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190963</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>