<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 538 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340035</link>
    <description>The appeal challenging the order-in-appeal for a refund of additional duty was rejected. The Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) was directed to issue a speaking order within a specified time frame, emphasizing compliance with the Customs Act. The judgment highlighted the importance of providing proper reasoning and citing relevant law in such orders to ensure fairness and adherence to statutory provisions. The decision underscored the significance of addressing deficiencies in refund applications and the necessity of following legal precedents for effective adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2017 10:09:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=461063" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 538 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340035</link>
      <description>The appeal challenging the order-in-appeal for a refund of additional duty was rejected. The Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) was directed to issue a speaking order within a specified time frame, emphasizing compliance with the Customs Act. The judgment highlighted the importance of providing proper reasoning and citing relevant law in such orders to ensure fairness and adherence to statutory provisions. The decision underscored the significance of addressing deficiencies in refund applications and the necessity of following legal precedents for effective adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340035</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>