https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340031 Recovery proceedings cannot continue where statutory appeals have been filed in terms of judicial directions, the required pre-deposit has been made, and the appeals have been entertained. In that setting, a demand treating the earlier time limit as expired and seeking coercive recovery is inconsistent with the subsisting appellate process and the protection already granted. The result is that the recovery order is liable to be quashed, while the assessee's right to pursue the appeals with the benefit of the earlier directions remains intact during pendency of the appeals. en-us Fri, 17 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 21 Mar 2018 12:51:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340031 Recovery proceedings cannot continue where statutory appeals have been filed in terms of judicial directions, the required pre-deposit has been made, and the appeals have been entertained. In that setting, a demand treating the earlier time limit as expired and seeking coercive recovery is inconsistent with the subsisting appellate process and the protection already granted. The result is that the recovery order is liable to be quashed, while the assessee's right to pursue the appeals with the benefit of the earlier directions remains intact during pendency of the appeals. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Fri, 17 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340031