<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Appellant&#039;s 50% land ownership claim questioned due to lack of financial contribution; raises issues of unexplained investment.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=33725</link>
    <description>Unexplained investment in land - the appellant had entered into a deal to purchase this land and subsequent gone to get it registered; the eventual seller to her had registered it earlier as a purchaser; she was purported to be clearly 50% owner; no one can believe that she was entitled to such a benefit without spending a single rupee. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2017 09:51:54 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2017 09:51:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=461056" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Appellant&#039;s 50% land ownership claim questioned due to lack of financial contribution; raises issues of unexplained investment.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=33725</link>
      <description>Unexplained investment in land - the appellant had entered into a deal to purchase this land and subsequent gone to get it registered; the eventual seller to her had registered it earlier as a purchaser; she was purported to be clearly 50% owner; no one can believe that she was entitled to such a benefit without spending a single rupee. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2017 09:51:54 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=33725</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>