<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Cash Purchases Under Scrutiny: Section 40A(3) Examines Legitimacy of Bogus Transactions in Income Tax Case.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=33724</link>
    <description>Bogus purchases addition - The only valid argument is that there could be no sales without purchases. But the price at which the goods were purchased remained a grey colour when admittedly the payment was made in cash. As the undisputed fact that the payments were made in cash under section 40A(3) is attracted - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2017 09:51:47 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2017 09:51:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=461052" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Cash Purchases Under Scrutiny: Section 40A(3) Examines Legitimacy of Bogus Transactions in Income Tax Case.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=33724</link>
      <description>Bogus purchases addition - The only valid argument is that there could be no sales without purchases. But the price at which the goods were purchased remained a grey colour when admittedly the payment was made in cash. As the undisputed fact that the payments were made in cash under section 40A(3) is attracted - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2017 09:51:47 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=33724</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>