<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 530 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340027</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, limiting the disallowance to Rs. 2,86,655, aligning with the exempt income earned by the assessee. It was held that the disallowance under section 14A read with Rule 8D should not surpass the exempt income, following a similar decision by the ITAT Mumbai Bench.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2017 09:51:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=461047" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 530 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340027</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, limiting the disallowance to Rs. 2,86,655, aligning with the exempt income earned by the assessee. It was held that the disallowance under section 14A read with Rule 8D should not surpass the exempt income, following a similar decision by the ITAT Mumbai Bench.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340027</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>