<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 521 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340018</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the reassessment proceedings as bad in law and illegal, finding the reopening action under Section 148 to lack jurisdiction and be based on vague and unsubstantiated reasons. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of a rational connection between reasons recorded and income escapement belief, citing various case laws. The Assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed, and the reassessment proceedings were deemed invalid, leading to the addition of income being dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2017 09:51:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=461038" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 521 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340018</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the reassessment proceedings as bad in law and illegal, finding the reopening action under Section 148 to lack jurisdiction and be based on vague and unsubstantiated reasons. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of a rational connection between reasons recorded and income escapement belief, citing various case laws. The Assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed, and the reassessment proceedings were deemed invalid, leading to the addition of income being dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340018</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>