<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (8) TMI 546 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190959</link>
    <description>Delay was condoned, but the Supreme Court recorded that there was no consideration on merits and dismissed the civil appeals. The order does not state any substantive legal principle on Central Excise; it only reflects the procedural disposal of the matter after condonation of delay.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Mar 2017 12:25:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=461018" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (8) TMI 546 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190959</link>
      <description>Delay was condoned, but the Supreme Court recorded that there was no consideration on merits and dismissed the civil appeals. The order does not state any substantive legal principle on Central Excise; it only reflects the procedural disposal of the matter after condonation of delay.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190959</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>