<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (12) TMI 340 - Delhi High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190957</link>
    <description>The expression &quot;carry out any work&quot; in section 194C does not extend to professional services rendered by advocates, architects and chartered accountants. A CBDT circular cannot enlarge the statutory scope by treating such professionals as covered persons under the provision, so the circular was held ultra vires section 194C and struck down to that extent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Mar 2017 11:53:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=461016" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (12) TMI 340 - Delhi High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190957</link>
      <description>The expression &quot;carry out any work&quot; in section 194C does not extend to professional services rendered by advocates, architects and chartered accountants. A CBDT circular cannot enlarge the statutory scope by treating such professionals as covered persons under the provision, so the circular was held ultra vires section 194C and struck down to that extent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190957</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>