https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340016 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT KOLKATA allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order. The appellant, a provider of output services, was deemed eligible to take CENVAT credit on the impugned goods despite investigations revealing irregularities. The recovery of irregularly availed CENVAT credit by the appellant amounting to Rs. 13,35,939 was deemed unjustified, as the appellant successfully argued that credit cannot be denied when the supplier has paid duty and issued valid invoices. The tribunal upheld the appellant's eligibility to take credit, emphasizing the revenue-neutral nature of the situation. en-us Wed, 01 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 25 Sep 2017 16:27:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340016 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT KOLKATA allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order. The appellant, a provider of output services, was deemed eligible to take CENVAT credit on the impugned goods despite investigations revealing irregularities. The recovery of irregularly availed CENVAT credit by the appellant amounting to Rs. 13,35,939 was deemed unjustified, as the appellant successfully argued that credit cannot be denied when the supplier has paid duty and issued valid invoices. The tribunal upheld the appellant's eligibility to take credit, emphasizing the revenue-neutral nature of the situation. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 01 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340016