https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340013 The Tribunal rectified a typographical error in the Final order, correcting the number of blocks showing positive results. It maintained that no service tax was payable and clarified that additional issues discussed in the order were clear and unambiguous. The Tribunal refused to rectify these observations due to a pending appeal before the apex court, granting the Respondent liberty to contest it there if desired. The application seeking rectification was disposed of, emphasizing the finality of the decision made by the Tribunal on 16/02/2017. en-us Thu, 16 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 11 Mar 2017 10:09:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340013 The Tribunal rectified a typographical error in the Final order, correcting the number of blocks showing positive results. It maintained that no service tax was payable and clarified that additional issues discussed in the order were clear and unambiguous. The Tribunal refused to rectify these observations due to a pending appeal before the apex court, granting the Respondent liberty to contest it there if desired. The application seeking rectification was disposed of, emphasizing the finality of the decision made by the Tribunal on 16/02/2017. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 16 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340013