<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 513 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340010</link>
    <description>Alleged shortage of inputs required fresh adjudication because the reconciliation statement was not independently examined; the matter was remanded for a reasoned finding on actual shortage. Penalty under Section 11AC was unsustainable on rejected inputs where the dispute was debatable and the demand fell within the normal period; the penalty was set aside. Duty and corresponding penalties on returned duty-paid goods were also not sustainable, as the six-month re-issue requirement was procedural and could not justify fresh duty when D-3 intimation had been filed. Personal penalties on employees were likewise deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2017 13:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=460991" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 513 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340010</link>
      <description>Alleged shortage of inputs required fresh adjudication because the reconciliation statement was not independently examined; the matter was remanded for a reasoned finding on actual shortage. Penalty under Section 11AC was unsustainable on rejected inputs where the dispute was debatable and the demand fell within the normal period; the penalty was set aside. Duty and corresponding penalties on returned duty-paid goods were also not sustainable, as the six-month re-issue requirement was procedural and could not justify fresh duty when D-3 intimation had been filed. Personal penalties on employees were likewise deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340010</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>