https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340006 The Tribunal upheld the dismissal of the appeal against the Order-in-Appeal by the Commissioner (Appeals) regarding recovery of dues and interest. The appellant's challenge to the interest demand and the communication letters from the Bangalore Commissionerate through the Mumbai Commissionerate were deemed unappealable. Citing statutory provisions and the precedent of CCE vs. Electrolux Kelvinator Ltd. 2010 (255) ELT 122, the Tribunal concluded that once a demand is confirmed, the appellant is obligated to pay the dues and interest, making the recovery with interest unchallengeable. The appeal was dismissed, and the impugned order was upheld on 16/02/2017. en-us Thu, 16 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 11 Mar 2017 10:07:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340006 The Tribunal upheld the dismissal of the appeal against the Order-in-Appeal by the Commissioner (Appeals) regarding recovery of dues and interest. The appellant's challenge to the interest demand and the communication letters from the Bangalore Commissionerate through the Mumbai Commissionerate were deemed unappealable. Citing statutory provisions and the precedent of CCE vs. Electrolux Kelvinator Ltd. 2010 (255) ELT 122, the Tribunal concluded that once a demand is confirmed, the appellant is obligated to pay the dues and interest, making the recovery with interest unchallengeable. The appeal was dismissed, and the impugned order was upheld on 16/02/2017. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 16 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340006