<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 509 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340006</link>
    <description>Letters issued only to aid recovery of a confirmed central excise demand were treated as part of the statutory recovery machinery and not as independent adjudicatory orders, so they were not appealable. Once the duty demand had been confirmed and had attained finality, interest was recoverable as an incident of that principal liability. The Tribunal held that no separate show-cause notice or distinct proceeding was required for recovery of such interest, and the challenge to the recovery letters and interest demand therefore failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Mar 2017 10:07:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=460987" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 509 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340006</link>
      <description>Letters issued only to aid recovery of a confirmed central excise demand were treated as part of the statutory recovery machinery and not as independent adjudicatory orders, so they were not appealable. Once the duty demand had been confirmed and had attained finality, interest was recoverable as an incident of that principal liability. The Tribunal held that no separate show-cause notice or distinct proceeding was required for recovery of such interest, and the challenge to the recovery letters and interest demand therefore failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340006</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>