<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 507 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340004</link>
    <description>Mere mismatch between RG-1 stock records, the balance sheet and Form 3CD report cannot sustain duty demand, Cenvat credit denial or penalty without proof of clandestine removal, actual shortage, or disposal of goods. The demand in issue rested only on theoretical stock differences, with no physical verification establishing shortage and no evidence that inputs or finished goods had left the factory. It was also noted that financial and excise stock accounting follow different methods, and the same issue had already been decided on similar facts in the assessee&#039;s favour.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2017 12:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=460980" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 507 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340004</link>
      <description>Mere mismatch between RG-1 stock records, the balance sheet and Form 3CD report cannot sustain duty demand, Cenvat credit denial or penalty without proof of clandestine removal, actual shortage, or disposal of goods. The demand in issue rested only on theoretical stock differences, with no physical verification establishing shortage and no evidence that inputs or finished goods had left the factory. It was also noted that financial and excise stock accounting follow different methods, and the same issue had already been decided on similar facts in the assessee&#039;s favour.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340004</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>